| 68 |
Modify templates to specify MM/DD/YY format for dates |
|
|
Legislative Budget Board |
Richard Corbell |
Business Case, Statewide Impact Analysis, Project Charter, Project Plan, Project Plan Supplemental Tools, Monitoring Report, Acquisition Plan, Contract Amendment and Change Order Approval, Acceptance to Deploy, Project Closeout Report, Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes, Review Gate Approvals
|
| 67 |
Modify Monitoring Report template for ability to include Agency Personnel Services and Agency Personnel Fringe Benefits |
|
|
Legislative Budget Board |
Richard Corbell |
Monitoring Report |
| 66 |
Clarify guidance on deliverable signature requirements. |
|
|
Legislative Budget Board |
Richard Corbel |
Statewide Impact Analysis, Project Plan, Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes, Monitoring Report, Framework Guidance, Contract Amendment and Change Order Approval, Business Case, Acquisition Plan |
| 65 |
Guiding Principle 5 indicates that a future release of the Framework will provide a cross-reference of content among the various Framework tools. |
|
|
Department of Information Resources |
Roslyn Hotard |
Framework Guidance, Framework Other - Web |
| 64 |
Create and add a glossary of terms to the Project Financial Life Cycle (PFLC) Extension identifying many of the financial and budget terms used in the Extension. |
Recommend |
2/15/2012 |
Department of Aging and Disability Services |
Tom Jenkinson |
Framework Other - PFLC Extension |
| 63 |
Amend the Framework to include a detailed description of how continuous process improvement is achieved within the project lifecycle. |
Reject |
|
Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts |
Richard Dachowski |
Project Closeout, Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes, Framework Guidance, Review Gate Approval, Statewide Impact Analysis, Monitoring Report, Project Plan |
| 62 |
Project Plan submission files submitted to state-level entities often do not meet requirements specified in the Framework guidance. |
|
|
Department of Information Resources |
Roslyn Hotard |
Framework Guidance, Project Plan |
| 61 |
Align fields in the Business Case Workbook and among the Business Case Workbook and the Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes (related to Change Request 54). |
Recommend with modifications |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
Teri Augustine |
Framework Other - Web, Guidance, Statewide Impact Analysis, Business Case, Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes |
| 60 |
The Business Case Model and the Workbook Model provided on the DIR website uses an out of date version of the Workbook template. |
Withdrew On |
2/3/2010 |
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
Teri Augustine |
Business Case, Framework Other - All |
| 59 |
The Business Case Model and the Workbook Model do not align with the current Business Case Instructions. |
Withdrew On |
2/3/2010 |
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
Teri Augustine |
Framework Other - All, Business Case |
| 58 |
Although the Business Case implies that in some cases the qualitative factors can provide the foundation for justifying the project, there is not clarification on how QAT includes the non-monetary factors into the project approval process. |
Reject |
|
Department of Motor Vehicles |
Theol Jackman |
Business Case |
| 57 |
The current Business Case Workbook (BCW) does not provide the total project cost separately from the total project life cycle cost. |
Recommend with modifications |
|
Department of Motor Vehicles |
Theol Jackman |
Business Case, Statewide Impact Analysis, Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes |
| 56 |
The Acquisition Plan webpage, instructions, and template do not clearly and consistently state which types of acquisitions require use of the Plan. |
Recommend |
|
Health and Human Services Commission |
Sara Hill |
Acquisition Plan, Framework Other - Web |
| 55 |
Modify Framework templates (Business Case and SIA) to include fields for historical ITD numbers |
Recommend with modifications |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
Teri Augustine |
Statewide Impact Analysis, Business Case |
| 54 |
Modify the Business Case Workbook to calculate the cost of a project from initiation through implementation separately from the cost of product maintenance and operations |
Recommend with modifications |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
Teri Augustine |
Statewide Impact Analysis, Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes, Business Case |
| 53 |
Provide the ability to implement changes to dynamic content without triggering use of formal release and configuration management processes. |
|
|
Department of Information Resources |
Rose Wheeler |
Framework Other - Web, Framework Guidance |
| 52 |
Provide the ability to quickly scan and access a list of available Framework tools. |
Defer Until |
1/29/2010 |
Texas Department of State Health Services |
William Hanna |
Framework Other - Web, Framework Guidance |
| 51 |
Revise Framework guidance to indicate that the Contract Advisory Team (CAT) contact designated by the Comptroller of Public Accounts (CPA) is Mark KasPar. |
|
|
Comptroller of Public Accounts |
Mark KasPar |
Framework Other - Web, Framework Guidance |
| 50 |
Revise Framework guidance to reflect legislative changes adopted in the 81st Legislature Regular Session (2009) |
|
|
Department of Information Resources |
Rose Wheeler |
Framework Other - Web, Framework Guidance |
| 49 |
Framework guidance for when submission of the Monitoring Report ends is unclear, and is also inconsistent with the Quality Assurance Team (QAT) guidance. |
|
|
Department of State Health Services |
Suzanne Carter |
Monitoring Report |
| 48 |
Do not require Agency Head approval signature on the Review Gate Approval documents. |
Recommend with modifications |
|
Texas Department of Transportation |
Karen VanHooser |
Review Gate Approval |
| 47 |
Inability to copy the financial information from the Business Case Workbook into the Business Case Word document because the Workbook is password protected |
Recommend |
|
Office of the Attorney General |
Scott McKenzie |
Business Case |
| 46 |
Submission requirements for the Framework Contract Amendment and Change Order Approval deliverable are inconsistent in the Framework guidance and Quality Assurance Team (QAT) guidance. |
Recommend |
|
Leg Budget Board for the Quality Assurance Team |
Richard Corbell |
Framework Guidance, Framework Other - Web, Contract Amendment and Change Order Approval |
| 45 |
Lack of clarity in Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes Instructions - Section 3.1.2 |
Recommend with modifications |
|
Department of Information Resources |
Rose Wheeler |
Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes |
| 44 |
The business problem is the Framework guidance does not clearly convey information regarding applicability of the Framework to major information resources projects, regardless of the funding source. |
|
|
Department of Information Resources |
Rose Wheeler |
Framework Guidance, Framework Other - Web |
| 43 |
Inaccurate statement made within the solicitation and Contracting Review Gate web page. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
Don McGrew |
Framework Other - Web |
| 42 |
Clarify expected content of section 1.1 in order to provide guidance and examples. |
Recommend |
|
Department of Information Resources |
Roslyn Hotard |
Configuration Management Plan |
| 41 |
The desired outcome is to ensure the Framework guidance and tools convey the most accurate and up-to-date information possible. |
|
|
Department of Information Resources |
Rose Wheeler |
Risk Management Plan, Framework Guidance, Business Case |
| 40 |
Revise Framework guidance and tools as necessary to replace references to the word document with references to tool or deliverable. |
|
|
Department of Information Resources |
Rose Wheeler |
Framework Guidance, Project Plan |
| 39 |
No business problem exists. The desired outcome is to revise Framework guidance to reflect the legislative change referenced in House Bill 3560 relating to transferring to the Comptrolller of Public Accounts (CPA) the duties of TBPC that do not primariily concern state facilities. The agency name "TBPC" must be changed to "CPA." |
|
|
Department of Information Resources |
Roslyn Hotard |
Risk Management Plan, Acceptance to Deploy, Acquisition Plan, Business Case, Communication Management Plan, Framework Guidance, Contract Amendment and Change Order Approval, Review Gate Approval, Performance Management Plan, Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes, Statewide Impact Analysis, Project Closeout, Framework Other - Web, Project Charter, Project Plan, Configuration Management Plan |
| 38 |
Merge four of the Supplemental Tools into the Project Plan tool including the Risk, Communication, Configuration and Performance Plans. |
Recommend |
|
TWC, HHSC, CPA |
Leslie Howes, Don McGrew, Cindy Gray |
Supplemental Tool - Project Plan, Framework Other - Web, Risk Management Plan, Configuration Management Plan, Project Plan, Communication Management Plan, Performance Management Plan, Framework Guidance |
| 37 |
Revise Framework guidance to reflect legislative changes adopted in the 80th Legislature Regular Session (2007). |
Recommend |
|
Department of Information Resources |
Rose Wheeler |
Statewide Impact Analysis, Business Case, Acquisition Plan, Framework Other - Web, Project Plan, Framework Guidance |
| 36 |
Streamline and clarify guidance for the Business Case when possible. |
Recommend |
|
Department of Information Resources |
Rose Wheeler |
Business Case |
| 35 |
Combine the 4 sub-plans into the main project plan, combine redundant sections such as glossaries, and landscape selected tables in appendices to allow all information about a single item on one row. |
Reject |
|
Texas Workforce Commission |
Leslie Howes |
Project Plan, Performance Management Plan, Communication Management Plan, Configuration Management Plan, Risk Management Plan, Framework Other - Web, Framework Guidance |
| 34 |
Beginning of each template: In item 4, provide direction about whether the abbreviated instructions are to be deleted. In item 5, it says to update page numbers only; however, the desired method still leaves incorrect page numbers |
Recommend |
|
Texas Workforce Commission |
Leslie Howes |
Framework Extension - SDLC, Communication Management Plan, Configuration Management Plan, Performance Management Plan, Supplemental Tool - Project Plan, Contract Amendment and Change Order Approval, Risk Management Plan, Acceptance to Deploy, Monitoring Report, Supplemental Tool - Risk Management Plan, Framework Guidance, Project Plan, Acquisition Plan, Review Gate Approval, Business Case, Framework Other - Web, Statewide Impact Analysis, Project Closeout, Project Charter, Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes |
| 33 |
Recommend making references to law and policy that supports the Framework a hyperlink for easy reference. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Workforce Commission |
Leslie Howes |
Framework Guidance, Framework Other - Web |
| 32 |
Business Case Workbook, Cost Analysis and Cost-Benefit Summary sheets 1. Separate one-time from recurring costs in the detail and the summary. 2. Provide an additional column for the one-time costs to include the corresponding amount for each item that is included in the project's Information Technology Detail (ITD) for the LAR and BOP. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Workforce Commission |
Leslie Howes |
Business Case, Framework Guidance |
| 31 |
Risk Management Checklist asks if funding is set aside, suggesting its part of Management Reserve. Costs allocated to risk managmeent are contingency reserves and part of the budget. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Supplemental Tool - Risk Management Plan |
| 30 |
Supplemental Documents - consider adding a sign-off page to the supplemental documents. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Supplemental Tool - Project Plan, Supplemental Tool - Risk Management Plan |
| 29 |
1.3 Performance Objectives - Recommend swapping the order of 1.3 Performance Objectives with 1.2 Roles Definition. Completing the roles definition needs the performance objectives identified first for inclusion into the matrix. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Performance Management Plan |
| 28 |
3.2.1 Risk Items and 3.2.2 Risk Status - An explanation of the available tools should be in a separate paragraph. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Risk Management Plan |
| 27 |
3.4 Work Activities - Recommend developing the WBS and WBS Dictionary in a separate document and referencing here. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Project Plan |
| 26 |
3.3 Estimation Methods and Estimates - Recommend changing the estimate recommendation to be closer to a generally accepted (PMI) definitive range. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Project Plan |
| 25 |
2.2 External Interfaces. The table only provides columns for the organization name and the person. Provide a column for a description of the relationship or purpose of the organization. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Project Plan |
| 24 |
Recommend using a simple risk table with the possible headings of: Risk/Trigger/Mitigation while expanding the instructions. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Monitoring Report |
| 23 |
QAT - 2.1 Project Cost - Provide a space for Current Amount Encumbered. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Monitoring Report |
| 22 |
QAT Template - General Information - Consider adding a field for reporting frequency, e.g. quarterly, monthly, and add a field for the due date of the document. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Monitoring Report |
| 21 |
QAT Monitoring Report - The cover sheet has a place for signatures. Add key stakeholder titles to the signature block. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Monitoring Report |
| 20 |
Introduction - Recommend providing a section delineating project objectives. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Monitoring Report |
| 19 |
Business Case Worksheet - Overall (section) - Require explanations for evaluation factor extremes with the ratings of both 1 or 5. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Framework Other - Business Case Worksheet, Business Case |
| 18 |
8.0 Revision History - Change the document title from "Name" to "Name of Preparer" or some other more descriptive heading. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 17 |
6.1 Methodology - Add the concept of prioritization to the project selection. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 16 |
5.4 Financial Analysis - The instructions do not map directly to the template. Develop a one-to-one correlation from the instructions to the template. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 15 |
5.1 Statutory Fulfillment - The table in the template does not suggest the level of detail shown in the instructions. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 14 |
5. Project Evaluation - Indicate in the business case template and instructions this data is associated with the business case detailed data found in the worksheet. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 13 |
4.3 Performance Metrics - Redesign the table in the template to help develop metrics while providing more instructions in the template. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 12 |
4.2 Goals and Objectives - Clarify instructions in the template - provide more detail while in the template while referring to the instruction section for good examples. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 11 |
3.3 Current Technology Environment - Add to the instructions - for example, when saying "provide brief description" define 'brief' and 'description' while providing examples for each of the areas in the template. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 10 |
2.2 Business Case Team Members. Create a more comprehensive table format which would drive completing the requisite information. |
Recommend |
|
Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 9 |
The CAB Change Request Form - enable the spell checker allowing the development of correctly spelled documents |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Framework Other - CAB Change Request Form |
| 8 |
Business Case Template - Cost Analysis Tab (P14 Section) - Add Accessibility estimation cell (similar to Disaster Recovery). |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Business Case |
| 7 |
Project Plan Template - 5.2 Quality Standards: Recommend expanding section to include additional PM best practice standards. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
John C. Smith |
Communication Management Plan, Business Case, Risk Management Plan, Acquisition Plan, Project Charter, Project Plan |
| 6 |
Remove the words Framework Tool from the Framework Quick Reference heading. |
Recommend |
|
Department of Information Resources |
Roslyn Hotard |
Framework Guidance |
| 5 |
Having a version and revision date on the Monitoring Report serves no purpose. Reporting period should be used instead |
Recommend |
|
Texas Workforce Commission |
Jeanette Bradfield |
Monitoring Report |
| 4 |
Revise the Version History introductory text in all Framework Instruction tools. Remove reference to "including a glossary." Change the word "document" to "tool", where applicable. Match text to text in SDLC tools |
Recommend |
|
Department of Information Resources |
Rose Wheeler |
Acquisition Plan, Contract Amendment and Change Order Approval, Business Case, Risk Management Plan, Project Charter, Project Plan, Communication Management Plan, Review Gate Approval, Configuration Management Plan, Statewide Impact Analysis, Acceptance to Deploy, Project Closeout, Post-Implementation Review of Business Outcomes, Monitoring Report, Performance Management Plan |
| 3 |
Identify statutory references in the Submission Requirements Timeline Description for project approval and other similar activities |
Recommend |
|
Texas Department of Transportation |
Karen Van Hooser |
Test Plan |
| 2 |
Indicate in the Framework Quick Reference that the Acquisition Plan is referenced in statute as the Procurement Plan. |
Recommend |
|
Texas Department of Transportation |
Karen Van Hooser |
Framework Guidance |
| 1 |
Have a one click button to download all the Framework tools - handbook, instructions, templates, worksheets and examples. |
Reject |
|
Texas Health and Human Services Commission |
Sherri Conner |
Business Case, Framework Other - Web |